Can a reality TV show discourage corruption?
Viewers from Nepal to Nigeria vote for the most honest civil servant
THE timing could not have been better. In the same week as two civil servants in Nigeria appeared in court for embezzling funds earmarked for International Anti-Corruption Day, the finalists of “Integrity Idol” were announced. In this reality television show, honest civil servants working in corrupt countries compete for glory, fame and, occasionally, a live chicken. The show is a hit: over 10m people have watched it and more than 400,000 have cast their votes in favour of their Integrity Idols.
“Integrity Idol” started in Nepal in 2014 and has since spread to Pakistan, Mali, Liberia, Nigeria and South Africa. Five finalists, vetted by a panel of judges, are chosen to be interviewed. They explain why they deserve the prize. “I come to work late. My boss could ask ‘Why are you late?’ (…) I say I slept a little longer. Say it the way it is! Face the consequences!” one nominee exhorts.
It is not always easy to find good contestants. The Nigerian nomination period was extended because of the poor quality of entrants. “People were nominating their auntie because she gave them money,” says Odeh Friday, who runs the campaign. Others thought they qualified because they came to work on time. One policeman was surprised by his nomination because, he explained, he was involved in shady contracts. Another nominee resigned after he realised that background checks might dig up old dirt.
“Integrity Idol” claims to steer clear of politics. Elected officials may not be nominated. Nor, in some countries, may people in the army. Even so, the show delivers a punch in the face to crooked politicians and their cronies, sometimes just by its timing: in Liberia last year, it aired while presidential elections were embroiled in fraud investigations.
It is difficult to know what impact the show is having, though the Massachusetts Institute of Technology has begun to measure it. Change may be gradual. Gareth Newham at the Institute of Security Studies in South Africa thinks its greatest contribution will be in changing attitudes. “Too many young people believe that you can only get a job if you belong to the [ruling party]. What has been missing is a focus on the ordinary people who do good work.”
This article appeared in the Middle East & Africa section of the print edition under the headline "Good clean entertainment"
Middle East & Africa January 27th 2018
- Turkey’s offensive in Syria complicates an already chaotic war
- Can Syria’s Kurds keep control of their territory?
- Is America wrong to cut aid to Palestinian refugees?
- Francophone Africa’s CFA franc is under fire
- Can a reality TV show discourage corruption?
- Ethiopia’s regime flirts with letting dissidents speak without locking them up
- South Africa is getting land reform wrong
Discover more
After pushing its economy to the brink, Egypt gets a bail-out
But a record-setting investment from the UAE will not fix its chronic problems
Gaza is on the brink of a man-made famine
Israel and Hamas reject a ceasefire even as people starve
Senegal proves the doomsayers wrong
Bassirou Diomaye Faye’s win is a triumph for the country’s democracy